Speaking in Delhi in November 2016, Manohar Parrikar, India’s then Defence Minister, said there should be an element of unpredictability in the country’s military strategy. He wondered whether India’s nuclear doctrine should be constrained by a ‘no-first-use’ posture. The essence of the defence minister’s introspection was that ambiguity enhances deterrence. This view has been expressed by several nuclear strategists. Nuclear doctrines are not written in stone and are never absolutely rigid. They are not binding international treaties that must be adhered to in letter and spirit. Fifteen years have passed since India’s nuclear doctrine was approved by the Cabinet Committee on Security in January 2003. A review of the nuclear doctrine is long overdue. Credible minimum deterrence and the posture of no-first-use have stood the test of time. But is there no conceivable operational contingency that justifies a first strike? Do we need a new nuclear policy for our new geopolitical reality? This book delves into the debate and charts out a way ahead.

Admin

Share
Published by
Admin

Recent Posts

Let’s Talk Legacy

Yaksha: What is the greatest wonder?Yudhisthir: Every man knows that death is the ultimate truth…

6 months ago

The Freedom Manifesto

What is your purpose, your Dharma, your innate tendency? Your only path to freedom is…

6 months ago

Pure Vegetarian

The key to making the best vegetarian Tamil food is cooking it at home. Prema…

7 months ago

Dalit Kitchens of Marathwada

'This is the food my parents ate and their parents ate ... It is an…

7 months ago

Spiritual Anatomy

From the internationally bestselling author of The Heartfulness Way comes a journey to the center…

7 months ago

Spiritual Anatomy

From the internationally bestselling author of The Heartfulness Way comes a journey to the center…

7 months ago